Archive | strategy RSS feed for this section

Generative, Inspired, Focused Performance for Breakaway Success — Let’s Distinguish Generative

Generative performance stands with inspired and focused performance to create breakaway success.  Today I am only going to focus on the generative aspects of performance.

Generative is an adjective, which means it describes something — in our case, performance.  The definition of generative is: having the power or function of generating, originating, producing or reproducing.  Thank you Miriam Webster.

Let’s stick with generative as “having the power or function of originating or producing.”  That means something moves or changes when generative power or function is applied.  There is a powerful energy associated with generating.

My friend and mentor Bill Schwarz in Atlanta wrote a book called The Generative Organization.  The book is somewhat autobiographical, somewhat mystical.  Its story line focuses on moving an organization from reactive behavior to inspired performance.  In it he points out that if you only see what others see that cause a reactive state to exist — things like recurring events, problems, quick fixes, long-term consequences — then you are still part of the problem.  Until you, as a leader, go through the other four generative steps, including recognizing leverage points and aligning the organization around them, to see yourself as the designer of the organization, you are still at the effect instead of being the cause of a future.

This is a deep conversation greater than the length of this blog, so I encourage you to read Bill’s book.  You will find it at www.inspiredperformance.org. I have personally witnessed an entire company go through his weekend program and come out a different kind of company — generative, inspired, and ready to get focused on what matters.  Talk about courage.

Being truly generative makes a difference that no one will ever forget, not just for the company, for the larger community.  When your organization is organized to do that, you are truly generative.

Is your organization organized to be truly generative? If not, what do YOU think stands in the way?

Comments { 0 }

Employee Engagement — Structures that Inspire ‘A’ Teams

I have said previously that ‘A’ Players like to be measured because they want to know when they have met or exceeded expectations, their own and yours.

Different teams require different structures, so for example sales teams require CRM.  That should be obvious, but for some organization it isn’t.  They probably aren’t reading this blog, because they have fallen behind in their technology savvy.

Today there is no excuse for not capturing sales data.  If you experience resistance from your sales management or a sales team member, you may be getting feedback from someone who doesn’t want to be measured, which suggests that person isn’t an ‘A’ player.  Look more deeply.

Senior executive teams need meetings with one another on a regular basis, and I do not mean meetings that get put off when there’s an emergency.  Consider that there are emergencies because you aren’t strategically thinking together regularly.

‘A’ teams need a leader who challenges them to think their best thoughts, be on their best behavior as a leader.  Challenging conversations are a structure.  They need report cards, theirs from you and theirs to you the CEO/President/Founder/Grand Poo-Bah of any title.  They need off-sites for strategic thinking and planning.  Those are structures.

What else do they need as a structure?  Executives need to be able to count on having conversations that matter deeply, whether they ask for them or not, in part because they need to learn how to hold those conversations with those who report to them.  I recently was asked to help a CEO hire a senior executive.  We used the Harrison Assessment to profile the candidate against the expectations of the position.  His results scared the potential employee off.  The CEO’s executive coach said to me, “Probably a good thing.  If the candidate doesn’t want to delve more transparently into himself then he won’t be a good fit for this team.”

If you need support for generating conversations that matter, on this website you can order senior executive team conversation starters.   And if you want to keep and inspire ‘A’ teams with structures, you will look beyond the obvious ones, which you know with your eyes closed.

Comments { 0 }

Question your Assumptions – Publicly — no, Really!

Accountability Pays Jurdy Weekly Cartoon — Week 1

I propose a new year’s resolution:  Take your leadership insecurities to your peer group for review.  Consider that you might sometimes be “being right” when you are really being arrogant, and it is costing you credibility.

The downside of “being right” when dealing with a subordinate, can be costly.  For example, if an employee isn’t feeling heard, that employee might begin to withhold information which can begin the slippery slope of  mis-information, mis-interpretation, and bad feelings.

If you are feeling the least bit uncomfortable while considering the above possibility of arrogance, it might mean you are tapping into your conscience.

Here lies an opportunity to distinguish between arrogance parading as self-esteem, and challenging your assumptions.  One source for reflection on that topic is “Acting as if your assumptions are the truth,” number two in the downloadable free report on this website, “Seven Costly Mistakes Senior Executives Make that Cause Performance, Productivity and People to Suffer.”

What if you took your inquiry — or any internal discomfort as a leader— to your peers, not as gossip but as an opportunity to seek suggestions in the name of collaboration, cooperation, teamwork, productivity, authenticity, contributing and being contributed to?

As an executive coach I have witnessed the value of doing so.  One manager in particular was reluctant to expose herself to her peers, believing they would think less of her.  However, she took the coaching, rallied her courage, and the result was unexpected.  She actually garnered MORE respect for having been vulnerable in a situation everyone knew anyway!  It was a real lesson for her that the elephant in the room is more visible than most people want to admit.

I recently submitted a white paper for consideration to present at the Conference for Global Transformation in the spring of 2012, the root of which was an inquiry into trustworthiness of business leaders.

The chairman of the review committee said, in accepting the paper for presentation, “I found your paper to be very interesting, particularly how you questioned your own views.  I think this is really an important point that should be brought forward….”  As a result of that feedback I changed the title of my paper from “Transforming Leadership in Business…” to  “Transforming the Leader Within:  Questioning Self as Access to Expanded Thinking Capacity.”

What does this bring up for you?  Your questions and thoughts make a rich dialog.

Comments { 0 }